Rural-urban differences in the pattern of referrals to an asynchronous teledermatology service

  • Josep Vidal-Alaball Gerència Territorial de la Catalunya Central, Catalan Health Institute, Sant Fruitós de Bages, Barcelona
  • Jacobo Mendioroz Peña Gerència Territorial de la Catalunya Central, Catalan Health Institute, Sant Fruitós de Bages, Barcelona, Spain
  • Glòria Sauch Valmaña Gerència Territorial de la Catalunya Central, Catalan Health Institute, Sant Fruitós de Bages, Barcelona



Telemedicine is particularly useful in rural areas where can facilitate access to specialised care in regions far from urban hospitals and can prevent unnecessary travel. The purpose of this research was to evaluate the degree of resolution of an asynchronous teledermatology service in the Bages County, comparing urban and rural primary care centres.

Methods and findings

A longitudinal descriptive study of referrals from 14 Primary Care Teams to a hospital dermatology service as a result of a previous referral to a teledermatology program was performed, comparing years 2015 and 2016 and urban with rural practices.

Both in urban and rural areas there was an increase in referrals to the teledermatology service in 2016 compared to the previous year (12.9% and 0.3% respectively). In the two years analysed, referral rates to the teledermatology service per thousand inhabitants from rural centres was statistically much higher than that of urban centres (p<0.001). The number of referrals to the face-to-face dermatology service after a teledermatology consultation decreased significantly in both urban [OR=0,81 (0,70-0,93) p=0,001] and rural centres [OR=0,64 (0,57-0,72) p<0,001].


The asynchronous teledermatology service established in the Bages County increases the resolution of primary care teams as reduces referrals to the face-to-face dermatology service. This effect is more pronounced in rural than in urban areas. Such finding may indicate the need to prioritize telemedicine services in rural primary care practices.


1. Wootton R. Telemedicine: a cautious welcome. BMJ [Internet]. 1996;313(7069):1375–7. Available from:
2. Dario C, Luisotto E, Pozzo ED, Mancin S, Aletras V, Newman SP, et al. Assessment of Patients’ Perception of Telemedicine Services Using the Service User Technology Acceptability Questionnaire. Int J Integr Care. 2016;16(2):13–4.
3. Eedy DJ, Wootton R. Teledermatology : a review. Br J Dermatol. 2001;4(144):696–707.
4. Livingstone J, Solomon J. An assessment of the cost-effectiveness, safety of referral and patient satisfaction of a general practice teledermatology service. London J Prim Care (Abingdon). 2015;7(2):31–5.
5. Ekeland AG, Bowes A, Flottorp S. Effectiveness of telemedicine: a systematic review of reviews. Int J Med Inform [Internet]. 2010 Nov 11 [cited 2015 Aug 26];79(11):736–71. Available from:
6. Whited JD, Warshaw EM, Kapur K, Edison KE, Thottapurathu L, Raju S, et al. Clinical course outcomes for store and forward teledermatology versus conventional consultation: a randomized trial. J Telemed Telecare [Internet]. 2013;19(4):197–204. Available from:
7. Jennett PA, Affleck Hall L, Hailey D, Ohinmaa A, Anderson C, Thomas R, et al. The socio-economic impact of telehealth: a systematic review. J Telemed Telecare [Internet]. 2003 Jan [cited 2014 Dec 19];9(6):311–20. Available from:
8. Mars M, Maurice. Telemedicine and advances in urban and rural healthcare delivery in Africa. Prog Cardiovasc Dis [Internet]. 2013 Nov [cited 2017 Jul 21];56(3):326–35. Available from:
9. Bradford NK, Caffery LJ, Smith AC. Telehealth services in rural and remote Australia : a systematic review of models of care and factors. Rural Remote Heal [Internet]. 2016;16(3808). Available from:
10. Moffatt JJ, Eley DS. The reported benefits of telehealth for rural Australians. Aust Heal Rev [Internet]. 2010 [cited 2016 Oct 22];34(3):276–81. Available from:
11. Weinstock MA, Nguyen FQ, Risica PM. Patient and referring provider satisfaction with teledermatology. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2002;47(1):68–72.
12. Polinski JM, Barker T, Gagliano N, Sussman A, Brennan TA, Shrank WH. Patients’ Satisfaction with and Preference for Telehealth Visits. J Gen Intern Med. 2016;31(3):269–75.
13. Klaz I, Wohl Y, Nathansohn N, Yerushalmi N, Sharvit S, Kochba I, et al. Teledermatology: Quality assessment by user satisfaction and clinical efficiency. Isr Med Assoc J. 2005;7(8):487–90.
14. Devine J. User satisfaction and experience with a telemedicine service for diabetic foot disease in an Australian rural community [Internet]. Bega; 2009. Available from:
15. Vidal-Alaball J, Álamo-Junquera D, López-Aguilá S, García-Altés. Evaluación del impacto de la teledermatología en la disminución de la lista de espera en la comarca del Bages (2009-2012). Aten Primaria. 2014;9–10.
16. Idescat. Institut d’Estadística de Catalunya. El municipio en cifras [Internet]. 2017 [cited 2017 Nov 29]. Available from:
17. Domínguez Amorós M, Monllor Rico N, Simó Solsona M. Món rural i joves. Realitat juvenil i polítiques de joventut als municipis rurals de Catalunya [Internet]. Estudis: 31. Barcelona: Generalitat de Catalunya; 2010. Available from:ítiques+de+joventut&btnG=#4
18. Van Der Heijden JP, De Keizer NF, Bos JD, Spuls PI, Witkamp L. Teledermatology applied following patient selection by general practitioners in daily practice improves efficiency and quality of care at lower cost. Br J Dermatol. 2011;165(Table 1):1058–65.
19. Hall B. Patient and Provider Satisfaction with the Use Telemedicine: Overview and Rationale for Cautious Enthusiasm. J Postgr Med. 2005;51(4):294–300.
How to Cite
VIDAL-ALABALL, Josep; MENDIOROZ PEÑA, Jacobo; SAUCH VALMAÑA, Glòria. Rural-urban differences in the pattern of referrals to an asynchronous teledermatology service. International Archives of Medicine, [S.l.], v. 11, june 2018. ISSN 1755-7682. Available at: <>. Date accessed: 01 june 2023. doi:
Primary Care